As a mom now, I find John Reed more menacing than ever. A large boy of fourteen, recently sent home
from school. A thick, fleshy boy on the
verge of manhood who has been used to indulging all his tastes and
appetites. Trapped in the house with
him, is a thin and stunted Jane, who has been for years a convenient outlet for
John’s sadism. As a grown woman now, it’s
not hard to see where this will all end up in a few years. Perhaps that more than anything explains
Jane’s miraculous escape (as it seemed to her at the time) to school. It must have been obvious to the physician (apothecary)
called to treat Jane’s bruised and cut head after her seizure in the Red
Room. He professes to be concerned for
the child’s nerves, but I’m not so convinced that’s the only worry.
Aside from the new menace I feel from the opening pages - I
am struck by one other thing that I missed through all these years. Bronte chose to give both the torturer of
Jane’s childhood and the cousin/potential suitor at the end of the narrative the
same name. The second character is
St.John Rivers to be sure. But it can’t be
coincidence (even for a common name) that Bronte created this echoing
connection between the characters. They
practically book nd the narrative.
Bronte (subtly – she was a minister’s daughter after all) connects
St.John’s zeal with the abuse Jane suffered in her youth.
No comments:
Post a Comment